Names From… Norway
I’m going to try to produce name lists semi-daily, probably every three days or so, but these are not normal lists! I will provide personal commentary whatever “insight” I can muster. And without further ado, here is my very first list: names from Norway.
Top 10 MALE names:
- Jonas- In the US in 2007 this ranked #331, and it’s rising steadily. I am sure it will explode this year or in the next few years due to- you guessed it- the Jonas Brothers. While it is an alright name for me, I prefer the Old Testament Jonah. The literary connection to Lois Lowry’s novel The Giver does get Jonas a bonus [
] in my book, as does the Jonas Salk potential hero-name. - Mathias- I like this one more than Matthew, which incidentally has been growing on me. Mathias ranked 779 in ‘07, and its popularity has fluctuated greatly. Still, if you want an intersting way to get to Matt but find Matthew too popular, this could be the way to go. Matthias is less popular, clocking in at 816 under Mathias AND Matias (795).
- Magnus- If Mathias and Magnus sound similar together, it’s possibly because you’ve heard them as the names of Will Ferrell’s two kids (he spells it Mattias, however, presumably because his wife is Swedish). Magnus is one of those names that sounds great in Roman history and on supermodel babies, but not so great on the average (American, at least) child- or MY future child. An appealing nn, however, is the ever-more-popular Gus, heard on Augusts and Anguses everywhere. It’s either that or Maggie I suppose…
- Elias- This moniker reminds me of Elias Howe, sewing machine pioneer. As a version of Elijah, I think it’s spunky and modern on a boy. But I didn’t think popular, until I saw that it ranked 173 in 2007. It sort of has a nn problem, for the only thing I can think of besides the blantantly female Ellie is just plain Lee, which is fine but lacking luster.
- Emil- As the male form of the Latin Aemilius, it is hard to ignore the elephant in the room: female form Emily’s massive English-speaking-world popularity. Emil isn’t even ranked in the top 1000. I sometimes prn it Em-EEl, sometimes EM-uhl, like its probably intended because of the lack of an “e” at the end a la Emile Hirsch.
- Henrik- This reminds me of Henrik Ibsen, Norwegian (big surprise) playwright of A Doll’s House and other literature. As a hero name (for Ibsen) and as a European alternative to the growing Henry and the falling Eric/k, frankly, Henrik rocks. It also is not ranked.
- Sander- Ah, a version of Alexander which is not overused. In the US at least imo, Alex and now Xander/Zander are done to death as nns of Alexander and as given names. While my feelings for Sander are neutral, anyone who’s looking for an Alexander alternative or at least a more creative nn without resorting to Lexie should consider this. Again, this is not ranked.
- Martin- This strikes me as the oddball of this list. In the US, Martin is a “dad” or “grandpa” name, or as seen in the new “Parent Trap” movie, a butler name. It is also the smart, obnoxious kid’s name on “The Simpsons.” Still, if you think about it, Martin sounds slightly debonair, slightly like James Bond’s middle name if he had one. The problem with me is that it’s awkward to prn. I have to say “Mart (awkward pause) In” or else it comes out sounding like “Mardin.” In other accents, it probably sounds fine, though. It was currently ranked 208 in ‘07.
- Tobias- Toby all grown up! Tobias is #477 in the US and becoming slightly more popular year by year. IMO [in my opinion] it is a cool, underused Biblical name with a killer nn. (For HP geeks, it’s also the name of Snape’s father, but you knew that already).
- Daniel- I’ll just come right out and say it: I LOOVE the name Daniel. To me, it just the right combo of strong, spiritual, masculine, and classic (and Daniel Jackson from Stargate Sg-1 does have something to do with that
). There is only one thing standing in Daniel’s way of becoming my top name: its’ popularity. It was #5 in 2007!
Top 10 FEMALE NAMES:
- Thea- So lovely! Thea was not in the top 1000 last year, but it certainly deserves to be. It is both classic-sounding and a legit. nickname. Just say it out loud: Thee- ah. It is soft like a warm breeze, and looks like it would be the color pink to me.
- Emma- I used to resent Emma, but now it’s on my short list. Though I prefer less popular offshoots such as Gemma, I have grown to admire its characteristics. Emma a really old name (it was going to be the stepmother of Eleanor of Aquitaine, who lived LOONG ago, for instance), it has strong lit. ties (Emma by Jane Austen), and it is just plain pretty. Too bad it was #3 in 2007 and has been hovering around the #1 spot for years now…
- Julie- This surprised me- I’d think Julia would be more popular in Norway. Anyway, though I prefer Juliet, Julia, Juliana/Julianna, and Julianne (in that order) I think Julie is a cute new classic with strong hero-ties, such as St. Julie Billiart. It was ranked #302 in 2007 and is dropping.
- Ida- I do not mean to offend, but when I think of “dowdy” names, Ida comes to mind. I think it is the look of the “I” and the “d” together- for some reason this looks plain in my eyes (I do really like the similar Ada and Aida however). That said, Ida does have a distinct Norse flavor- it sounds like a pioneer girl almost. It was unranked in ‘07, though due to the similar Ava I wouldn’t be shocked if it rose in popularity. (and yes, I do have a not so great association with this name…).
- Emilie- The quintessential American #1 name with an ending twist! This spelling conjures up Emilie de Ravin, “Lost” actress. While I like the name Emily/Emilie, due to their sheer numbers I wouldn’t personally consider it. Emilie is a cute, pretty name though, and the “-ie” keeps it eternally young. The Emilie spelling was ranked 582 and had been dropping in 2007.
- Nora- As the heroine of Ibsen’s A Doll’s House and as a nn for classics like Eleanor, I really like the name Nora. It is short, with a pleasant meaning (“Light”), and manages to be strong (with the “or”) and feminine simultaneously. I prefer it w/o the final “h” btw. In 2007 Nora was ranked 242 and appears to be climbing fast!
- Ingrid- Ingrid and Astrid, to me, are two way underused cool Scandinavian names. The former conjures up Old Hollywood, and it just sounds so cutting-edge to me though I’ve met a couple of Ingrids. The downside, though, is that no nns come to mind, just Ingie and Griddie (blech). In 2007 it was ranked 626 and it appears, like Nora, to be rising.
- Anna- Anna is a multinational, multi-century classic. In virtually every language it has a form, such as Annika or Annelies or Ana. Anna is a lovely, regal choice to make; this is all I can really say about it. It is quite ordinary however, and this is both a positive and a negative. In 2007 it was ranked #25 and it has been around that area for several years now.
- Sara- Much of what was said for Anna can be said for Sara. It exists in many forms, and I have seen many a fight on whether it should be spelled Sarah or Sara in English. While I was on the fence for awhile, I finally conceded that Sarah looks more aesthesically pleasing. Either way, you can’t go wrong with Sara, but you won’t exactly stand out. In ‘07 Sara was ranked 81 and appears to be falling in popularity.
- Sofie- On the list, it is indeed spelled this way, and it didn’t rank in the top 1000 in this spelling. Sophie, however, was ranked 82 and climbing RAPIDLY. A caution is that Sophie/Sophia/Sofie/Sofia is getting to be the most popular girl’s name in the US, and it is very widely used worldwide too. I often see it paired with Isabella- I’ve literally seen at least a dozen babies with the exact same name of Isabella Sophia. I can see the appeal though: it has a pretty, exotic, soft sound, an extremely appealing meaning, “wisdom,” and a royal pedigree.
Lola said,
January 7, 2009 at 2:25 am
Magnus is a perennial favorite of mine and I have to admit, Maggie on a guy is suprisingly appealing! I like Matthias/Mathias but prefer ‘ma-TEE-us’, the German way. (If you watch “the Ruins” {which is not a very scary horror film], Yummy Joe Anderson palys a Mathias and you can hear him say {in a plausible German/English accent] saying it. Very nice indeed. I just dislike Matt. Every third guy I grew up with was Matt, the other majors then were John, Robert & Joseph!. Matt seems middle aged to me (maybe because I am!) .
Martin appeals because of Dean Martin (heck Dean appeals because he feels Beatnik-y).
The girls don’t really thrill me but I do like Thea, especially as a nickname for Dorothea! I do like Ida. I find her refreshingly sweet & rather crisp. I like Ada too but prefer Eva to Ava. I find Ava trendy but Eva timeless. (go look at the total charting for it at SSA). I like Sofie too.Prefer Sophie but that’s just my Yankee eye showing. Overall, I prefer ‘ph’ to ‘f’. Anna’s lovely too. Not for me, personally but I admire her on other people’s girls! it’s almost bedtime for the little girl here, so I’ll be sure to check back later. And I’m adding you to my blogroll, if that’s okay!
Paige said,
January 7, 2009 at 2:32 am
ma-TEE-us definitely trumps all other pronounciations and takes the “Matt” issue out of the way- I like it! (and not to mention Joe Anderson…
)
Eva is definitely timeless, unlike Ava which now either brings to mind silver screen Old Hollywood or the early 2000s.
Thank you very much for adding me to your blogroll! Is it all right if I do the same?
Cat said,
January 7, 2009 at 5:26 pm
Sander: *sigh* Next to Sandy and Sasha for hunky “feminine” boys’ names. I’ve been tempted to use Alexander for Sandy, Sander, or Sasha for a long time now, but I just can’t warm to it (Alexander) completely. Sander is to die, though.
And an interesting note about the age of Emma: I’ve been working on a family tree, as you might know, and have found one back in 1152. Whether or not I’m actually related to her is questionable, but she certainly existed, and the name has been in use for one heck of a long time. Of the Top Ten, Ingrid is my fave, though. Old Hollywood to the max. Inga could work as a cute nickname.
Lola said,
January 7, 2009 at 6:50 pm
Sure, go ahead. Mutual traffic is always a plus!
Paige said,
January 7, 2009 at 9:27 pm
I just realized that I had “overused” instead of “underused” in Ingrid’s summary. I’m changing it now!
Cat, that’s so cool that you can trace your heritage back to the 1000s, and even cooler that you found today’s #2 girls name there!
Inga would make a cute nn for Ingrid. And now that I think about it, just plain Ing could work too. Sure, it’s a little offbeat, but it’s casual. And IMO, it sure beats Griddy.
appellationmountain said,
January 8, 2009 at 12:53 pm
Funny, I know a baby Ida. I keep wondering if the name will pop in the US – I didn’t realize it was so hot in Norway.
I’m not wild about Tobias and Toby. Can’t quite explain why, they just don’t sound right to me. Jonas will probably supernova ’round here thanks to the singing brothers – Kevin, Joe and Nick are already so common I don’t think we could see the impact.
I like Sander, too. It’s unexpected. While some might balk at using Sasha for a boy in the US, Sander would probably work as another unexpected nn for Alexander. (Though Alexei is my favorite!)
And I LOVE Ingrid!
JNE said,
January 8, 2009 at 7:01 pm
Ingrid is one of my favorites – I love the old Hollywood feel… And Inga was my choice of nn. But I could not get my husband on board with Ingrid before our girl came along. I have also heard it on a few girls recently (here in the states)… and I still love it! Thea is a lovely name.
None of the boy names are working for me… not sure why. Magnus is super-duper common in scandinavia – I used to work for a Swedish company and it seemed every other male colleague was called Magnus. It seems a bit egotistical to me, somehow. Agree that on a celeb baby is where it works in the US and not on a non-celeb kid. Aggie is another nn that could go with it I guess…
Ida is a surprise… I don’t have any experience with Norwegian, but I wonder if it is pronounced “EE dah” rather than “EYE dah” there? That would link it more closely to Eva in sound and is less ‘dowdy’ sounding to me… I even kind of like it at first listen.
Paige said,
January 8, 2009 at 9:06 pm
Ida prn “EE dah” is much more attractive, I agree. But then maybe it would be overheard as Eva? That would be interesting to see.
And Sander would be unexpected to see, but if the child was just Alexander and they insisted on being called “Sander” I wonder how many people would actually do it.
That being said, I like Alexei better then Sander anyway